Text(s)
Surah an-Najam and Plato’s “Myth of Metals” and “Myth of Er”
Surah al-Jathiya and Bertrand Russell’s “A Free Man’s Worship”
Surah al-Fatiha and Immanuel Kant’s “What is Enlightenment?”
Learning Objectives
With the lessons learned from Peirce’s essay, we will do a comparative analysis of Qur’anic and “scientific” positions on certain issues. The positions will be derived by contrasting selected Qur’anic passages and philosophical texts on a common set of questions. The goal of this analysis is to identify the (divisive) logic that underpins the reasoning which associates science with “objective facts” and religion with “subjective belief,” and move towards an alternate (relational) logic. The Qur’anic passages, philosophical texts and common questions are as follows:
Surah an-Najam and Plato’s “Myth of Metals” and “Myth of Er”
- What is the origin of humanity?
- What is the fate of humanity?
- How do we attain knowledge of (a) and (b)
Surah al-Jathiya and Bertrand Russell’s “A Free Man’s Worship”
- What is “reality”?
- What is “truth”?
- How should we live our life in light of (a) and (b)?
Surah al-Fatiha and Immanuel Kant’s “What is Enlightenment?”
- What are the characteristics of an “enlightened” person?
- What are the obstacles to becoming “enlightened”?
- How do we become “enlightened” in light of (a) and(b)?
The goal of this comparative analysis is to lay bare the reasons and reasoning that underpins associating science with “objective facts” and religion with “subjective belief.”